[Burichan] [Desudesudesu] [Photon] [Gurochan] [Futaba] [Tomorrow] - [Home] [RSS Live Feed] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
Name
Link
Subject
Comment
Boku?
File
Password (for post and file deletion and editing)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, 7z, bz2, gz, rar, torrent, zip
  • Maximum file size allowed is 409600 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.

File: 1315518368563.jpg -(356.3 KiB, 1200x1693) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
364829 No.53155   [Delete]   [Edit

For those who are able to properly follow the trends, has there been a decline of straight CD and an increase of trap x male?

>> No.53160   [Delete]   [Edit]

hope so.

>> No.53161   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315532488476.jpg -(352.2 KiB, 715x567) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
360657

Guy x trap is straight so long as the guy isn't pining for the trap's cock & balls, and the trap tries as hard as possible to emulate a female.

...And I mean that in the most polite way possible.

But in all seriousness, for as long as I've been around /tr/ (and koChan when it was still around), guy x trap and trap x trap always seemed to be more popular and have a longer shelf life, hence the lots and lots of relevant content. At least in terms of 2D stuff. I wouldn't know about the other things.

>> No.53162   [Delete]   [Edit]
>Guy x trap is straight so long as the guy isn't pining for the trap's cock & balls, and the trap tries as hard as possible to emulate a female.

No.. Save that for people with integrity issues. A male banging another male is still technically gay no matter how pretty and feminine he is or what the guy does or doesn't do with his body. Calling it straight is blasphemy, and I don't mean in a religious sense. When people look for straight they want Male x Female (with a vagina). Traps are soft gay porn, not straight. There needs to be a clear line between the two so people don't get them mixed up.

>> No.53164   [Delete]   [Edit]

As a gay male I have to say I have no objections to a lack of breasts and vag in trap porn.

>> No.53165   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53155
I don't know about that since I ignore most Trap x Girl stuff. I think its safe to say most of us prefer trap x male. When I go to exhentai looking for new trap doujins I key in yaoi because that's the one tag all the good ones have in common. It works for me because I like shota too, there's a lot of good femmy shota out there that doesn't make it on /tr/.

>> No.53166   [Delete]   [Edit]

Ultimately what is gay/homosexual, straight/heterosexual, bisexual, lesbian, asexual, pansexual, etc. doesn't matter. They are just labels. They don't have any real existence or objective existence or truth beyond their place as an idea in the mind of humans and the conception of man. Biologically life is infinately too fluid to fit within the confines of any definition or label. Labels and definitions change over time and biology preceded them. Not to insinuate that biology doesn't change, it does, it evolves all the time. Where do people or third gender or fourth gender and beyond fit within our paradigm? There's always some paradigm created at the exclusion of someone, therefore all paradigms are inherently elitist.

>> No.53168   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315537495787.jpg -(799.5 KiB, 715x1011) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
818673

>>53166

I know what's pansexual. Being attracted to bread.

Pic unrelated.

>> No.53172   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53166They are just labels. They don't have any real existence or objective existence or truth beyond their place as an idea in the mind of humans and the conception of man.

Which is why explicitly hetero, homo, and bisexual behavior has been observed in various species of mammals right?

>> No.53173   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53172
Applying labels to non-human animals. Sure, it's been done before. Why don't these various species consider their own activity to be homosexual or heterosexual? These are human perceptions on non-human animals. Get over yourself, seriously.

>> No.53193   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53173

>Why don't these various species consider their own activity to be homosexual or heterosexual?

Who says they don't? In any case, how you perceive things doesn't change the world. Even if a lion didn't differentiate meat and plant food, he would still be eating meat. And when you responded to the previous poster, you knew you didn't make up his post in your mind. You assumed there is some reality out there, and that this person's post meant he disagreed with you, otherwise you wouldn't have been motivated to respond.

As for your post about biology, complexity does not mean there are no patterns and principles to understand life by. Life has been highly organized by evolutionary adaptation within species, as well as by chemical and physical principles. It sounds like you want to throw out all our physiology books (not to mention the rest of biology) and our medical science. No more heart, no more brain, no more bones. No more aspirin, no more chemotherapy, no more antibiotics.

>> No.53194   [Delete]   [Edit]

It this gonna become one of those threads where all we do is make straw man arguments?

You know that would make a good doujin; a guy and a trap have an argument supported only with fallacies and it ends with them having angry sex and making up.

Last edited 11/09/09(Fri)18:41.

>> No.53195   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53193
Sorry, but you don't dictate existence or reality. Your own perceptions are just that, your own damn perceptions. Don't even attempt to push them on others. And no, biology is not just highly organized, it's also highly disorganized and contradictory. It's also beyond both, which you fail to recognize do to your own extremely limited and flawed perception.

>> No.53196   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53193
Also, quit pretending that definitions and words have any external reality. They don't. The thing you called meat existed before the word or definition of meat ever came into being, through the meddling of humans. And also, it's debateable whether meat actually exists or not, since it could be said that nothing exists outside your own mind.

>> No.53197   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53195
I'm confused by your statements, it seems like you're contradicting yourself everywhere. Am I your non-existent perception, or do I exist and have certain properties, like my hands I'm typing with and my disagreement with you?

Let's forget how you're trying to push your beliefs on me. I mean, this is communication, this is why we speak to each other. How can I push something on others if they are perceptions and don't exist, or if I'm the perception and don't exist? Even communication between people requires that they sense external reality; if all they did was perceive internally, there would be no method of communication through which to push anything, aside, of course, from my existence and theirs.

You say I have "limited and flawed perception" (you keep talking as if I exist and have these objective traits), but if nothing is real, perception can't be "limited" and "flawed." If life doesn't exist, you can't say anything about biology.

"perception" and minds are parts of reality, even if that were all there is. Something can't do something, like perceive the world, and not exist.

>>53196
Well, a word is different from the object; they're just symbols for reality that we agree upon. It's why two people independently see a lion eating meat, (but only at the same location at the same time).

>through the meddling of humans

So are humans real or not? I'm not trying to mock you, I really can't see how this makes sense.

>it could be said that nothing exists outside your own mind.

True, but if that were the case, (1) my mind would still be real, (2) for all the patterns in the world, like water quenching thirst, flies causing buzzing noises, or people walking into you if neither of you avoid each other, no one believes this. If you did, you wouldn't be talking to me, and you wouldn't take care of your body enough to live.

>> No.53198   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315612125392.jpg -(147.6 KiB, 850x613) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
151164

>>53197
For bumping, here's a couple trap x males.

>> No.53199   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315612189495.jpg -(265.6 KiB, 800x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
271998
>> No.53200   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315612234134.jpg -(83.0 KiB, 600x867) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
84990
>> No.53201   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315612326714.jpg -(76.8 KiB, 800x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
78663
>> No.53202   [Delete]   [Edit]

trap x male is the only trap stuff I like (other than solo) so I hope so!

>> No.53204   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53168
heh, good one

>> No.53207   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315630056123.jpg -(232.2 KiB, 499x599) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
237792

I just noticed...we have general girl x trap and trap x trap threads in the Index, but not a general guy x trap thread. So...let's make it so, Number One.

>>53194

I....would definitely read this sort of thing. Especially if the trap was tsundere. Tsunderes are the best at arguments.

>> No.53211   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315636259703.jpg -(97.5 KiB, 800x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
99891

Old but relevant.

>> No.53212   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315636399323.jpg -(141.6 KiB, 1192x1226) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
144970
>> No.53213   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315636939683.jpg -(167.0 KiB, 600x800) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
171020
>> No.53215   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315653108206.jpg -(1.2 MiB, 1200x1500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
1257506
>> No.53252   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53199
What is this picture from?

>> No.53262   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53214
Isnt that his little sister?

>> No.53265   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315757648234.png -(174.2 KiB, 635x660) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
178429

>>53262

I recall it being tagged as Marjorine, but now I can't find where it was originally posted. >_>

>> No.53277   [Delete]   [Edit]

>>53252
It's a work done by Kuro Usagi (黒兎).
http://www.pixiv.net/member.php?id=42675

http://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=kurot

The characters are from South Park.
LEFT:Craig Tucker (http://southpark.wikia.com/wiki/Craig)
RIGHT:Craig's sister "Ruby" Tucker (http://southpark.wikia.com/wiki/Tucker_Sibling)

>> No.53280   [Delete]   [Edit]
File: 1315792012896.jpg -(677.8 KiB, 833x2500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
694062

>>53277

Well, now I just feel retarded. Oh well, postan some more content.



Delete Post [] Password
Report Post(s) to Staff